Eye On Modesto

Thoughts and observations about Modesto and Stanislaus County

Archive for the tag “Modesto City Council”

Congratulations Mayor Garrad Marsh as a New Day Dawns

Tuesday’s City Council meeting was a breath of fresh air.  Mayor Ridenour bowed out gracefully and Mayor Marsh assumed his position confidently.  He immediately set about making a few of his wishes known. 

 

During the public comment portion of the meeting I asked the council to re-visitModesto’s TIN CUP ordinance and return campaign contribution limits to the prior levels.

 

In 2005Modesto, at the behest of the Chamber of Commerce, raised the level of contribution allowed to $3,000 over a 48 month period. I believe the levels should be returned to the prior level of $1,000. 

 

In recent conversations with Chamber of Commerce leadership it has been made known the Chamber would back this adjustment of contribution levels.

 

What many people are not aware of is Mayor Marsh was one of the Council members in 2005 who voted against the increase.  It is hoped with the Mayor’s backing and the Chamber’s stamp of approval this change could come about soon.

 

To see the request go to http://www.modestogov.com/sirepub/mtgviewer.aspx?meetid=421&doctype=AGENDA

 And fast forward to 52.30 minutes into the meeting.

 

After dispensing with the consent calendar, Miguel Dinoso asked the Council to ensure firefighters and police would have at least minimal training in Spanish in the Shakelford area..

 

He also spoke out about community concerns regarding the lack of parks in the neighborhood.  Mayor Marsh responded by saying, “”we need to fix that,” simple and to the point.

 

The new logo was on display at the meeting.  On the big screen it was side by side with the old logo for and the difference was striking.  I’ve never heard of a CEO deciding to move his company to a town based on a logo, but updating ours can’t hurt.

 

Mayor Marsh was adamant thatModesto’s motto of Water, Wealth, Contentment, Health remain.

 

We have a real opportunity to improve lifeModesto, let’s join arms and take a step forward together.

The Power of the Mayor, Myth or Reality?

By Dave Thomas

Good morning.  I wish the Citizens of Modesto, including our friends at the BEE would read and understand the underlying law of our City.  I have copied and pasted parts of the Modesto City Charter.  Please note that, contrary to today’s story, “Marsh: No big changes just yet”, there are certain facts:

1.  The City Mayor has absolutely no “…authority to prepare the (City) budget”.
2.  Neither the Mayor nor Council Members have any authority to place items on the Meeting Agenda.
3.  Neither the Mayor nor Council Members have any authority to speak to, influence, or request action from any City employee.  
4.  The City Manager is solely responsible for the executive and administrative duties of the City, and no one can interfere or influence him.  

Simply put, the Mayor is the ceremonial and political leader of our City, akin to a highly paid cheerleader.  He has absolutely no power or authority to DO anything.  At least, he can do  only that which the City Manager tells him to do.  The Council has no power or authority at all.  The closest you can say about the Mayor/Council is that they can refuse to pass Agenda items requested by the City Staff.  Since when has that happened?

Thus, City management will not change from what the City Manager wants to do.  At best, the Council can fire a City Manager, then hire yet another well trained bureaucrat who will continue do what ever he wants to.

Thank you, Dave

2-1.03 – Agenda.

In order to facilitate the orderly conduct of the business of the Council, the City Clerk shall be notified no later than 5:00 p.m. of the Wednesday immediately preceding a regular Council meeting of all reports, communications, ordinances, resolutions, contract documents or other matters to be submitted to the Council at such meeting. Immediately thereafter the City Clerk shall arrange a list of such matters according to the order of business and furnish each member of the Council, the City Manager, and the City Attorney and each department head with a copy of the same prior to the Council meeting and as far in advance of the meeting as time for preparation will permit.

The City Clerk shall mark with the word “Consent” those items on the agenda regarding which it can reasonably be expected that there will be no discussion by members of the City Council, the City staff or interested persons in the audience. At any time prior to the meeting or at any time during the meeting prior to Council action on the consent agenda any member of the City Council or the City staff or any interested person may request that a consent item be removed from the list of consent items, such item shall be taken up for consideration and disposition separately from the remainder of the consent items not so removed. In order to make clear that the vote on consent items is about to occur, the City Clerk shall read out the title or brief summary of each item marked “Consent” on the agenda to those present at the Council meeting. The presiding officer will immediately upon the conclusion of this reading advise those present that the appropriate time has come to speak on any item so read out from the consent calendar. Those wishing to speak will then confirm the consent item number or numbers they wish to address. Any such item shall be separately taken up for consideration in numerical order prior to the Unfinished Business portion of the agenda. All other consent items, whether previously removed from the consent calendar or not, shall then be considered at one time by a roll call vote after a motion duly made and seconded.

(Ord. 1084-N.S., amended by Ord. 313-C.S., Ord. 444-C.S., Ord. 1130-C.S., Ord. 1896-C.S., Ord. 2892-C.S., § 1, and Ord. 3094-C.S., § 1, effective 8-6-98)

2-1.04 – The Presiding Officer.

The Mayor shall be the President of the Council and shall preside at all its meetings and perform such other duties consistent with his office as may be imposed by the Council or by vote of the people. He shall be entitled to, and must vote, but shall possess no veto power. He shall be recognized as the official head of the City for all ceremonial purposes by the courts for the purpose of serving civil process, and by the Governor for military purposes. In the time of public danger or emergency, he may, with the consent of the Council, take command of the police, maintain order and enforce laws.

The Mayor shall preserve strict order and decorum at all regular and special meetings of the Council. He shall state every question coming before the Council, call for the vote, announce the decision of the Council on all subjects and decide all questions of order, subject, however, to an appeal to the Council, in which event a majority vote of the Council shall govern and conclusively determine such question of order. He shall sign all ordinances adopted by the Council during his presence. In the event of the absence of the Mayor, the Vice-Mayor shall sign ordinances as then 

 

2-1.22 – Council Not to Interfere in Administrative Service.

Neither the Council nor any of its committees or members shall direct, request or attempt to influence, either directly or indirectly, the appointment of any person to office or employment by the City Manager or in any manner interfere with the City Manager or prevent him from exercising his own judgment in the appointment of officers and employees in the administrative service. Except for the purpose of inquiry, the Council and its members shall deal with the administrative service solely through the City Manager; and neither the Council nor any member thereof shall give orders to any of the subordinates of the City Manager, either publicly or privately.

SECTION 800. – CITY MANAGER.

There shall be a City Manager who shall be the chief executive officer and head of the Administrative Branch of the City government. The City Manager shall be chosen on the basis of the person’s executive and administrative qualifications with special reference to the person’s actual experience in, or the person’s knowledge of accepted practices with respect to the duties of the office as hereinafter set forth. No member of the Council shall be eligible for appointment to the office of City Manager during the term for which the member shall have been elected or appointed, nor within one (1) year thereafter. The City Manager need not be a resident of the City or State at the time of appointment, but during the City Manager’s tenure of office, the City Manager shall reside within the City.
When a vacancy occurs, the Mayor shall nominate at least two (2) candidates for Council consideration for appointment to the position of City Manager. The Mayor may express to the Council a preference among final candidates. The Council shall appoint the City Manager for an indefinite term and may remove the City Manager by a majority vote of its members; provided, however, that the City Manager shall not be removed from office during or within a period of ninety (90) days next succeeding the election of a member of the Council. The purpose of this provision is to allow any newly elected member of the Council to observe the actions and ability of the City Manager in the performance of powers and duties of this office.
(As amended November 7, 1989, and February 5, 2008)

SECTION 801. – POWERS AND DUTIES.

The City Manager shall be the chief administrative officer and head of the administrative branch of the City government. The City Manager shall be responsible to the Council for the proper administration of all affairs of the City and to that end, subject to the personnel provisions of this Charter, the City Manager shall have power and shall be required to:
(a)  Appoint and, when necessary for the good of the service, discipline and remove all officers and employees of the City except as otherwise provided by this Charter, and except as the City Manager may authorize the head of any department or office to appoint or remove subordinates in such department or office. The City Manager may also authorize the head of any department, including deputy directors, police captains and fire battalion chiefs, or other city employees as designated by ordinance, to recommend and impose discipline in accordance with this Charter.
(b)  Prepare the draft budget annually and submit it to the Mayor and Council, prepare the proposed budget annually and submit it to the Mayor and Council and be responsible for its administration after its adoption by the Council, prepare all other necessary budget documents, and prepare and submit to the Mayor and Council the Capital and Operating Mid-Year Budget Report.
(c)  Prepare and submit to the Council within ninety (90) days of the end of the fiscal year, a complete report on the finances and administrative activities of the City for the preceding year.
(d)  Review procedures relating to the assessment, levy and collection of ad valorem property taxes and make recommendations regarding the same to the Council if deemed appropriate.
(e)  Establish a centralized purchasing system for all City offices, departments and agencies.
(f)  Establish and enforce specifications for supplies, materials and equipment required by the City.
(g)  Cause all supplies purchased by the City to be inspected and a determination made that the same comply with specifications.
(h)  Prepare rules and regulations governing the contracting for, purchasing, storing, inventory, distribution or disposal of all supplies, materials and equipment required by any office, department or agency of the City government and recommend them to the Council for its adoption by ordinance. Preference shall be given to the purchase of supplies, materials and equipment from local merchants, quality and price being equal.
(i)  Enforce the laws of the State pertaining to the City, the provisions of this Charter and the ordinances, franchises and rights of the City.
(j)  Keep the Council advised of the financial conditions and future needs of the City and make such recommendations on any matter as the City Manager may deem desirable.
(k)  Make and execute contracts on behalf of the City involving budgeted or appropriated expenditures which do not exceed the amount specified by ordinance of the City Council.
(l)  Appoint advisory boards, without compensation, to assist the City Manager in the performance of the City Manager’s duty, if the City Manager deems it necessary.
(m)  Interchange employees between or among departments if the City Manager deems it proper so to do.
(n)  Immediately upon taking office, and annually thereafter, inventory and place a value on all real estate, buildings, furniture and fixtures, supplies and movable property of every kind and nature belonging to the City; and to require each officer or department head to inventory the same or any portion thereof. One (1) copy of such inventory shall be filed with the Council and one (1) with the auditor.
(o)  Be responsible for the custody and control of all City property, the custody and control of which has not otherwise been provided for by this Charter.
(p)  Perform such other duties as may be prescribed by this Charter or required of the City Manager by the Council not inconsistent with this Charter.
(q)  Sign all contracts, deeds and other documents on behalf of the City when authorized to do so by the Council or by this Charter.
(r)  The City Manager shall have the authority to transfer equipment and supplies between departments, and with the approval of the Council, sell obsolete, and unused or surplus personal property of the City.
(s)  The City Manager shall be accorded a seat at the Council table and shall be entitled to participate in the deliberations of the Council, but shall not have a vote.
(t)  The Council shall have the right to instruct the City Manager in matters of policy and the City Manager shall be responsible for implementing such Council policy. Any action, determination or omission of the City Manager shall be subject to review by the Council, but no such action, determination or omission shall be overruled or modified by a vote of less than four-sevenths of the members of such Council.
(u)  The City Manager, pursuant to Section 725 of the Charter, shall direct creation of draft written statements of Policy for each City department which is under the administration of the City Manager.
(v)  The City Manager annually shall conduct an independent, written performance evaluation of each head of a city department which is under the administration of the City Manager. Such performance evaluation shall include, without limitation, an evaluation of the department head’s performance in implementing the Council’s Statement of Policy for that department. The City Manager shall provide such performance evaluations to the Council for their review pursuant to Section 725 of the Charter. After such Council review, the Mayor may comment on the performance evaluation pursuant to Section 601(m) of the Charter.
 
(As amended April 20, 1971, November 4, 1980, November 7, 1989, and February 5, 2008)

The Gutting of the Tin Cup By the Modesto City Council

By Emerson Drake

Time Is Now Clean Up Politics – Tin Cup

Tin Cup Change 6/7/05

TO:  Mayor and Councilmembers

FROM: City Attorney

SUBJECT: Proposed Revision to theModestoMunicipal Code

CONTACT: Michael D. Milich, City Attorney, mmilich@modestogov.com, x75284

RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:

Introduction of an ordinance amending Section 2-8.01 of Chapter 8 of Title 2 of the

Modesto Municipal Code increasing the amount of campaign contributions over the prior 48

months that triggers a conflict of interest from $1,000 to $3,000, clarifying that campaign

contributions received by councilmembers in connection with their candidacy for any other

elective office do not count towards the $3,000 limit, and eliminating the limitation on

contributions in the week preceding the election.

BACKGROUND AND REASON FOR RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Modesto Municipal Code Section 2-8.01, et seq. (“TIN CUP Ordinance”) prohibits a

councilmember from exerting any influence on a City decision in which he/she has reason to

know they have a financial interest.  The ordinance states that a councilmember has a prescribed

financial interest if the decision will have a material effect on a major campaign contributor to

that member.  A major campaign contributor is defined under the ordinance to mean a person or

entity that has contributed $1,000 or more in the aggregate over the past 48 months.  The

ordinance was adopted by the City Council in 1986 and has basically remained unchanged since

that time.

The ordinance also imposes a reporting requirement in addition to those imposed on

candidates by the Fair Political Practices Act.  Finally, the ordinance prohibits contributions

exceeding $99.00 in the final week preceding the election and continuing until the certification

of the election results.

On May 10, 2005, the Modesto City Council considered a letter from Rob Ellett, Chairman

of the Government Relations Committee of the Chamber of Commerce which requested that the

Council eliminate the TIN CUP ordinance.  By motion of the Council this issue was referred to

the Audit Committee.  The Audit Committee met on June 2, 2005, and unanimously

recommended that the TIN CUP ordinance be amended in the following respects:

· The $1,000 limit be raised to $3,000.Mayor and Councilmembers

Proposed Revision to theModestoMunicipal Code

Page 2

· The ordinance be amended to clarify that it does not apply to campaign

contributions received by a councilmember in connection with that

councilmember’s candidacy for any other elective office.

· The limitation on contributions in the week preceding the election be eliminated.

The changes recommended by the Audit Committee are set forth in the attached

ordinance.

MICHAEL D. MILICH

City Attorney

MDM/sw

Attachment

cc: City Manager

City Clerk

How it was passed: 6/28/05

This item removed from Consent.
B. Ordinance 3391-C.S. amending the Section 2-8.01 of the Modesto Municipal Code and repealing Section 2-8.03 of the Modesto Municipal Code relating to campaign reform (Tin Cup).
· Motion approving final adoption of Ordinance 3391-C.S. amending the Section 2-8.01 of the Modesto Municipal Code and repealing Section 2-8.03 of the Modesto Municipal Code relating to campaign reform (Tin Cup) recommended.

ACTION: By Motion (Keating/O’Bryant; majority; Dunbar, Jackman no; Marsh absent) approved the final adoption of Ordinance 3391-C.S. amending the Section 2-8.01 of the Modesto Municipal Code and repealing Section 2-8.03 of the Modesto Municipal Code relating to campaign reform (Tin Cup) recommended.

http://ci.modesto.ca.us/ccl/agenda/ar/2005/06/ar050614-08.pdf

http://ci.modesto.ca.us/ccl/minutes/2005/cc050628.asp

Will Candidate and now Councilman Dave Lopez Make Good on His Word?

By Emerson Drake

On October 24, 2011, Dave Lopez was being interviewed on Athens Abell’s “On Watch” television show when he made some promises to his constituents. One of them was in response to Ms. Abell’s question regarding the misuse of SCAP and NSP2 funds.  “If the audit comes back and it says there has been a misappropriation of funds and it’s this persons department will you personally call for their resignation?”

Dave Lopez’s response was “Absolutely, absolutely, that is what you should count on your local officials for. You find the bad piece and you cut it away.”  Yet the findings are in and Joe Muratore has been potentially threatened with debarment because of his misdeeds. Which means he could be prevented from ever having anything to do with government funded financing and the question we’ve asked Susana Wood, City Attorney, is will Modesto be barred from future participation in federal funds if Mr. Muratore remains on the City Council.  To this point we haven’t received an answer.

Quite honestly we don’t expect to receive one since she’s the council’s attorney and not the attorney for the citizens ofModesto.

.

Muratore’s fellow City Council members have remained completely silent including Dave  Lopez. This is an extremely sad state of affairs forModesto.  We have enough black eyes in the nation’s perception without having a councilman spreading his particular form of greed throughout the city’s business.

We can’t forget the $48,000 dollars still in question between Mr. Muratore and his business partner Ryan Swehla and Swehla’s business partner Scott Monday.

It appears these men have conspired to keep as much of the NSP2 money for themselves as possible by controlling the disbursement of funds from the city (remember the contractor couldn’t apply for more money because of the $1.2Million saved for Muratore’s Benchmark Realty’s use on the apartment on which Benchmark made the $62,500 commission).

Will Dave Lopez follow through on the ideal his campaign promise was based on, or is it business as usual in the family owned and operated Modesto?

It’s time for Modesto’s citizens to clean house and get respect back for their City Council. If any one on the city council remains either quiet or in support of Mr. Muratore they are part of the problem and not the solution.

To listen to Dave Lopez’s words go to

http://www.youtube.com/user/mrsathensabell#p/u/2/Ga6xNbp6XOM

On-Going Scandal in Modesto

By Emerson Drake

City Manager Gregg Nyhoff perpetuated the myth of “everything is fine” down at city hall at Wednesday night’s city council meeting.  The bobble heads were nodding in agreement that city workers overseeing the NSP2 funds are stretched too thin, rather than acknowledging pressure from local power brokers was responsible.  When you listen to members of the Commonwealth Group explain it away, it almost sounds plausible until you consider the web of intrigue that surrounds the scandal.

From city councilmen and their business partners scheming their way through the NSP2 maze of paperwork and guidelines, to newspaper publishers relatives being waist deep in the mire.

While the SCAP controversy abused everyone’s sense of reason, the NSP2 controversy exposed the raw naked greed of a city councilman who can’t use city attorney Susan Alcala Wood as a shield this time.

The premise that a city official can’t profit from NSP2 funds or HUD money isn’t obscure, not in the least.  It’s one of the first things you learn.

But when the money Ryan Swehla and Scott Monday funneled to Benchmark Realty (a company Swehla owns with Joe Muratore) first came to light, it was eclipsed by the SCAP scandal.

Needless to say, despite Mark Vasche’s claim of distancing himself from the reporting on this, it can’t be easy to be a reporter writing about Vasche’s son-in-law (Scott Monday).

Commonwealth members continue to support Councilman Muratore despite his being caught with his fingers in the till.  After all, his being on the council, adds unspoken pressure on city employees (unspoken by Muratore), while his partner doesn’t hesitate to play the “do you know who my partner is” card to anyone unaware of the affiliation.

Even most of the city council has remained silent on whether or not Muratore should resign his seat.

You can’t expect any pressure from his council district, considering that Mike Moradian has been inspecting all of the homes being “processed” by the conjoined triumvirate.

How can citizens ofModestoexpect to be treated with respect and honesty while the Bee management is shielding Muratore and his cohorts.

To be bluntly spoken, we can’t.  People need to express their dissatisfaction and outrage to the City Council and everyone they meet. 

We need to say the iconoclast, “We’re mad as hell and we’re not going to take it any more.

“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed, citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” 
― Margaret Mead

Post Navigation